
Most Brazil country-risk notes I see are a single line. That's the gap: there are four answers, and they don't move together.
FATF's call-for-action list, FATF's increased-monitoring list, the EU's high-risk third-country list and Annex I of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions each answer a different question. When a client, a beneficial owner or a payment corridor touches Brazil, the file should record where Brazil stands on each one — not a blended verdict. It should also record the date you checked, because these lists change several times a year.
This week, pull the Brazil files and see whether the country-risk section names all four lists and the date. If it doesn't, that's the gap to close before the next review.
Read: https://firm.cy/aml-country/brazil
Not legal advice. Verify against the primary source before acting.
FIRMCY screens names against all of the lists above — plus a worldwide PEP database and adverse media — with fuzzy matching and an audit-ready report for every check. New organisations get 3 free full assessments, no card required.
Start screening free Free PEP & sanctions check FATF high-risk countries Weekly AML briefing Live on Telegram ↗